Holding Over After Your Term Ends
…of compensation, medical expense payments, and attorney’s fees. Baxter won by that 2-to-1 vote. But of the two members who voted in Baxter’s favor, one was a holdover. His term…
…of compensation, medical expense payments, and attorney’s fees. Baxter won by that 2-to-1 vote. But of the two members who voted in Baxter’s favor, one was a holdover. His term…
…12, 2010, in the case of Baxter v. Danny Nicholson, Inc. The Court of Appeals, in its earlier opinion had based its holding on the difference. The Supreme Court, reversing…
…school continuing to use the property for educational purposes. See Brumley v. Baxter, 251 N.C. 691, 700 (1945). Additionally, with the enactment of Part VI. of S.L. 2023-107 (codified as…
…the trial judge satisfied both Article VI, Section 7 and G.S. 11-7 by taking and subscribing the statutory oath. In Baxter v. Nicholson, 363 N.C. 829 (2010), the North Carolina…
…on the topic, the North Carolina Supreme Court expounded on the exclusive emoluments clause in Brumley v. Baxter, 251 N.C. 691 (1945), with two important conclusions. First, if a conveyance…
…to veterans under this scenario was a public benefit sufficient to constitute consideration under the Exclusive Emoluments clause. Brumley v. Baxter, 251 N.C. 691, 700 (1945). But there was a…
…public use is a constitutionally adequate form of consideration. Brumley v. Baxter, 225 N.C. 691, 36 S.E.2d 281 (1945). [4] The authority to donate personal property under G.S. 160A-280 is…
…See the blog post by School of Government faculty member Frayda Bluestein, Donating Property: Beware of Constitutional Constraints, in which Professor Bluestein describes the case, Brumley v. Baxter, 225 N.C….