Recent Blog Posts
Authored by: Chris McLaughlin on Friday, August 29th, 2014
Happy Birthday, Tag & Tax Together! What, you haven’t bought a present yet? Well, you best get moving, because September 1 will mark the first birthday of the new taxation system for registered motor vehicles (“RMVs”) known informally as Tag & Tax Together.
By now everyone driving a car on the highways and byways of North Carolina should have experienced paying their RMV taxes at the same time they renew the tags on their vehicles. (Other than those gamblers who see how long they can drive with expired tags without getting pulled over by one of North Carolina’s finest, of course . . . )
Over the past year I’ve blogged about how the new process works, about bankruptcy issues relating to RMVs, and about the counties’ obligations to distribute RMV tax receipts to their municipalities. I’ve also published this bulletin on “gap billing” for vehicles that move between registered and unregistered status.
Today I’m back with an update about the new system’s financial performance. My report might surprise some readers—in a good way. Read more »
Authored by: Frayda Bluestein on Tuesday, August 26th, 2014
Should private information in government hands be considered public record? What about information in the hands of private entities that are carrying out governmental functions? These two issues dominated legislative consideration of the public records and open meetings laws in the 2014 session of the General Assembly. They involve the delicate balance between the strong public policy of transparency in government and the strong interests of private individuals and businesses in their privacy and in the protection of proprietary information. The legislature debated these policy issues, attempting to strike the right balance in several different contexts. As you read this post, think about how you have voted in each instance. Read more »
Authored by: Aimee Wall on Friday, August 22nd, 2014
On August 20, the North Carolina General Assembly adjourned sine die (Joint Res. 2014-8). The term sine die is from the Latin “without day;” this type of resolution means that the legislature did not set a date to return to Raleigh to continue the work of this legislative session. The House and Senate were considering several different adjournment resolutions and it looked like they might even return to Raleigh to take up additional legislative business after the elections in November. Ultimately, they opted to end the short session in August, which is fairly typical.
According to the resolution, the legislators will return in January to begin the 2015-16 biennium. It’s possible they could return to Raleigh sooner if the Governor reconvenes the legislature to reconsider vetoed legislation (NC Constitution, Art. II, Sec. 23) or the Governor or legislature calls an extra session (NC Constitution, Art III, Sec. 5; Art. II, Sec. 11). There have been a few rumors to that effect.
Now that it’s (probably) over, you may be wondering how can you learn more about the bills that actually passed. I have a few suggestions…
Authored by: Michael Crowell on Friday, August 15th, 2014
In July John Martin, the chief judge of the Court of Appeals, announced his retirement effective August 1st. Given the timing of his decision, state law requires an election in November to fill the seat but no primary in advance to reduce the number of candidates. It appears that everyone who has ever aspired to be an appellate judge sees this as an opportunity to catch the ring, and 19 candidates have filed. One of them will get more votes than the others, though it may not be very many, and will be elected with no run-off. Nineteen candidates, one vote, one time, most votes wins. Some people may think this is not the best way to choose a judge for an eight-year term on North Carolina’s second highest court. How did we end up with such an election? Read more »
Authored by: Diane Juffras on Wednesday, August 13th, 2014
The FLSA’s Professional Duties Test – Part 1
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that employers pay employees a time-and-half premium wage for hours worked past 40 in a workweek. Many employees are not entitled to this premium overtime pay, however, because they are “exempt.” In previous blog posts here, here and here, I have discussed two of the three kinds of exemptions from overtime pay – the executive exemption and the administrative exemption. This post introduces the professional exemption, the last of the three. The professional duties exemption involves not one kind of exemption but is actually several exemptions gathered together in one name. It will take me two posts to cover them all, this post and one more to come. That last one will by my last post in this series on FLSA exemptions.
Authored by: Chris McLaughlin on Monday, August 11th, 2014
[UPDATE: This post was edited in late August 2014 to reflect the General Assembly's ratification of S734, which among other actions permits non-attorneys to represent business entities before the Property Tax Commission.]
The county board of equalization and review, often called “the board of E&R,” is the first stop for a taxpayer who cannot resolve a dispute with the county assessor over a property tax assessment or exemption. The Machinery Act defines the authority and jurisdiction of these boards but offers very little guidance as to how a board of E&R hearing should be conducted. As a result, these boards operate very differently across the state’s 100 counties—as the Department of Revenue describes in its Members Handbook for Boards of Equalization and Review, hearings vary from “leisurely informal experiences to rigid, formalized proceedings.”
What’s the best approach? Boards of E&R hearings definitely don’t need to be as deadly serious as the famous courtroom scene in A Few Good Men. (Here’s hoping your taxpayers are slightly less volatile than Jack Nicholson.) Nor do boards of E&R need to follow strict rules of evidence and civil procedure . But as quasi-judicial proceedings, board of E&R hearings need to be formal enough so that all taxpayers have the opportunity to present their arguments to an unbiased board and to respond to rebuttal arguments presented by the county. Read more »
Authored by: Kara Millonzi on Saturday, August 9th, 2014
Coates’ Canons celebrated its five year anniversary this week! During the past five years, School of Government faculty members have authored over 680 posts, which have been viewed well over 1,000,000 times. We continually strive to improve the blog and appreciate your valuable feedback. We have made several recent changes based on your suggestions:
- All archived posts are now grouped by both category and subcategory. The categories are listed on the right hand side of the blog. To access the subcategories under each category, click on the [+]. To view the posts within each subcategory, simply click on the subcategory. The number of posts within each category and subcategory are included in parenthesis.
- The general search function is more robust. If you are searching for a blog post on a particular subject matter, simply type one or more key words in the search box in the upper right corner. A list of posts that contain that word or phrase will appear in the main window.
- The blog now includes a “featured posts” section. Periodically we will highlight a new group of archived posts on a related topic. We will use this section to create resource guides for courses and to provide ready information on relevant issues during the year.
Thank you for your continued support of Coates’ Canons! Keep the suggestions coming…